I don't think I would argue this. To a point, I agree.
A big downfall from Hog to MA is the matrix feature. However, I have dozens of templates for offsets and time values in my hog shows and literally hundreds of hours worth of editor programming already done.
I could perhaps duplicate the templates in MA but the editor on the hog3 is just faster for me.
Actually, Hog3 has a UPS built in as well. Sadly though if the computer locks up in the Hog to the point you need to cold start it, it can be a pain to wait the 2 minutes it takes for the UPS battery to discharge before the hog will shut off to be rebooted.
What do you mean by "fall over?"
If you are referring to crashing then I will tell you that the rate at which I program, I crash both desks just as often.
There is a bit of a difference in the business model and the cost of the desks determine the amount each company is willing to commit to support. Obviously MA support is going to be better in this regard.
This may be related to the specific people supporting. I happen to know some of the tech support people at HighEnd and the ones I'm friends with are pretty easy to deal with.
I've noticed this a few times but I haven't ever had as great a need to bug the MA support staff since I typically spec Hog3s.
The cost is proportionate I believe but there are still things I can do on a Hog that I can't do as fast on an MA.