Dear gents,
thanks for your answers and experienced comments.
We just disregarded the specs from the graphics card and didn't proof in advance.
The Matrox PR also guide me in the wrong direction...
Ruediger
ARCUS
Dear gents,
thanks for your answers and experienced comments.
We just disregarded the specs from the graphics card and didn't proof in advance.
The Matrox PR also guide me in the wrong direction...
Ruediger
ARCUS
you really really really whenever you push things have to test in advance - Dual 2GHz machines are old now - ancient in computer years.Originally Posted by RuedigerH
and when they came out such high resolutions would never even have been considered possible.
because i dont run any machines with older OS'sOriginally Posted by SourceChild
and because there have been significant graphics changes since 10.4.6
yes these new features definitely need newer machines with faster cards....Originally Posted by tharding
and catalyst has very large requirements for graphics and textures.Originally Posted by SourceChild
and for it to perform well.
there will be no difference in image between 3072x768 and 2400x600- something somewhere has to do the scaling - you dont get anymore detail by running the outputs at higher resolution.
---
i would like to suggest that you use these devices on pci-e machines, and not the older ones.