Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: HD Content

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    I have a Firewire 800 setup 4 drives in RAID 0.

    What about H264, I saw some HD movies using this particular CODEC.

    Thanks

    Gian
    Gian
    Ibeam SP
    SP, Brasil

  2. #2
    h264 like mpeg2 is rubbish for use in catalyst.

    it uses interframe compression.

    you cant access each frame without getting a dreadful performance hit - as you need to decode several frames to get one.

    looping, changing in and out points. fast random access to individual frames - are all impossible - all things that are essential on a 'media server'.

    some media servers use mpeg2 - but they have to convert the mpeg2 to a special format - with all i-frames...

    ---

    i have tested all this stuff thoroughly.

    photojpeg 50% is the thing that works - and photojpeg is a really good codec.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Stockholm
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by samsc

    i have tested all this stuff thoroughly.

    photojpeg 50% is the thing that works - and photojpeg is a really good codec.
    Beacon DigiGobos® will make the folder for Catalyst in 50% PhotoJPEG with
    the coming HD series, I tested also and ended up with the same result as R!
    Peppe Tannemyr
    Beacon DigiGobos®
    www.digigobos.com / www.gobogroup.com

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by peppe
    Beacon DigiGobos® will make the folder for Catalyst in 50% PhotoJPEG with
    the coming HD series, I tested also and ended up with the same result as R!
    i have also done tests between photojpeg 30% and photojpeg 100%.
    and there is a very significant performace hit when you go over 60% - and almost no change in the image

    photojpeg performance is very sensitive to compression 'quality'.

    nothing to do with catalyst - its the performance of quicktime.

  5. #5
    It's worth remembering that at the 100% quality setting Photo-Jpeg has 4:4:4 colour sampling in RGB 8 bit. At this level, it's very hard going on the processor to decode multiple streams of this... ;-) However, it is a fantastic and very efficient offline storage method. Unless you like storing your content in Animation Codec (which eats hard drive space), then it's a good bet.

    Photo-Jpeg uses DCT intraframe compression technology, and therefore does not suffer from the problems that interframe compression based codecs (H264, Sorenson, Mpeg-2 etc) do.

    Hugh
    Altered State Ltd

  6. #6
    photojpeg uses 4:4:4 sampling at every compression rate.

    what dct algorithms do is throw away higher frequency information -

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jpeg
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_cosine_transform

    the sampling will be quite obscure and irrelevant to most peoples understanding.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Gian
    I have a Firewire 800 setup 4 drives in RAID 0.

    What about H264, I saw some HD movies using this particular CODEC.

    Thanks

    Gian
    i doubt whether a four drive firewire raid is any faster than a single scsi disc.
    but i havent tested your raid.

Similar Threads

  1. Content problem
    By Mr_P in forum Bug reports
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 20-01-2006, 10:28 AM
  2. Standard Content Licence
    By NevBull in forum Catalyst Software
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 17-03-2005, 09:55 AM
  3. Creating content in photoshop
    By Urb in forum Catalyst Software
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-03-2005, 12:31 AM
  4. Reelhouse HD content library
    By samsc in forum Catalyst Technology questions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-02-2005, 11:05 AM
  5. Content Formats and encoding.
    By Dan C in forum Catalyst Technical support
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-04-2004, 09:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •