Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: G5 2.5 dualprocessor replacement

  1. #11
    right. thanks for the re: indeed fw800 is not the way to go.
    you can use fw800 - in the end you get what you pay for.
    there isnt much mystery to this.

    you pay for performance.

    I have tested fw400 and fw800 with raptor drives using GTech cases.
    http://www.g-raid.com/
    --on my intel mac mini, and intel imac- this is the fastest setup you can get.

    And of course it works. just not quite as well as scsi- with content the way people have normally used it.

    if you need an answer for yourself - you have to test it for yourself - and see whether the results are acceptable for your requirements - at the price you want to pay.

  2. #12
    one more thing.

    fw800 as an interface - never works faster than the exact same internal sata drive could work.

    whatever the raid config - its never going to be faster than a single internal sata drive.

    the bandwidth of fw800 is not really enough to do anything with a raid configuration - unless you have really poorly performing drives.
    thats why most people in this area have put sata connectors on their drive cases.

    current headline data transfer rates can be found at:

    http://www.storagereview.com/php/ben...bench_sort.php

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    rotterdam / reykjavík
    Posts
    51
    excellent excellent information and support, thanks a bunch !

    btw, is the nvidia 6600 that comes standard with the pcie g5s worse than the card that came standard with the dualproc 2.5 g5 ?

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by GideonKiers
    excellent excellent information and support, thanks a bunch !

    btw, is the nvidia 6600 that comes standard with the pcie g5s worse than the card that came standard with the dualproc 2.5 g5 ?
    yes much worse.

    its the equivalent power of a graphics card like the nVidia 5200 - from some time ago.

    tests done here:
    http://www.barefeats.com/mutant4.html
    show the standard 6600 - performing about 1/4 of the speed of a 7800.

    Note that the latest version of aperture - has apparently stopped supporting this card.

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by samsc
    fw800 as an interface - never works faster than the exact same internal sata drive could work.

    whatever the raid config - its never going to be faster than a single internal sata drive.
    this article shows this kindof thing:

    http://www.barefeats.com/hard71.html

Similar Threads

  1. H.264 Codec, Wow
    By litemover in forum Catalyst Technology questions
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 26-03-2007, 01:27 PM
  2. Time code on cue list - V4
    By CatalystGirl in forum Bug reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 27-04-2006, 04:04 PM
  3. Two Questions: Data Rate and MTC
    By Laura in forum Catalyst Technical support
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-08-2005, 02:05 PM
  4. Liquid Cooling- only lasts 2 years
    By samsc in forum Catalyst Technology questions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28-04-2005, 04:59 AM
  5. SAMSC and Edje Brain dump
    By timgrivas in forum Technology questions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 25-04-2005, 11:21 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •