Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: 4K resolution input

Hybrid View

  1. I have the AJA io4K working on my desk right now. mlorenz have you had any luck accessing multiple inputs on the AJA as in SDI 1 & 2? I am hoping i don't need one Aja per input and can use the 2 SDI's and the HDMI as discrete inputs into catalyst.
    Tyler Roach
    Eclipse Creativity, Inc.

  2. #2
    I used the aja io4k with the 4k input-option and 4 SDI inputs.
    So 4 Full-HD quarters, in the catalyst input in then cropped thoses quarters
    With the SDI1 and 2 you can only use once at a time when setting the card to Full HD

  3. #3
    Is the AJA IO4k a better option than the phoenix cards? how is the latency on the inputs?
    Paul Kenah
    Catalyst Expert

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by kiwi View Post
    Is the AJA IO4k a better option than the phoenix cards? how is the latency on the inputs?
    Hey Paul,

    I can't say that the AJAs are the better Option as I never compared them side by side, but just my feeling says that the AJA 4K got less latency (and you can input 50/60 HZ)...

    As a long term Phoenix User I switched to AJA 4K last year, when I upgraded my Catalysts to the recent Macs and definitely no regrets!

    Best

    Rolf

  5. #5
    with aja io4k could you use it for 4 differents inputs 1080i50hz ?

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by julien View Post
    with aja io4k could you use it for 4 differents inputs 1080i50hz ?
    Hey Julien,

    you can use the 4 different inputs with 1080P or PsF. The trick is to configure the AJA to 4K input in the desired Hz Range and as this 4K input will be handled with four quadrants and so 4 SDI Streams you just need to crop it in the Catalyst input section..

    All Input Streams need to have the same resolution and Rate..

    Best

    Rolf

  7. Bottom line on this is that you can only input 1920x1080 into catalyst at this point.

    I have tried the following: Aja IO 4K, Active Silicon Cards in a Sonnet case, Blackmagic UltraStudio 4K, and Blackmagic UltraStudio Express.

    All of them work just fine. I cannot comment on latency as i never really looked at them side by side.

    Active Silicon Cards: Richard has invested a lot of time making them work and they do just that work. Every Time!
    Aja IO 4K: works, flexable, but you only get access to one input at a time. Also that is not switchable via catalyst. Maybe you could script that?
    Blackmagic UltraStudio 4K: Expensive and very picky on what signals it likes. For example it wants a non standard version of 3G SDI. Fail.
    Blackmagic UltraStudio Express: Great for the price and you can get 2 to work on the same machine at the same time. Downside is no thunderbolt feed through.

    Hope that helps!

    I am now using the Active Silicon Cards and sometimes the Blackmagic UltraStudio Express depending on the project.
    Tyler Roach
    Eclipse Creativity, Inc.

  8. #8
    is ultrastudio 4K working with UHD resolution ?

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by julien View Post
    is ultrastudio 4K working with UHD resolution ?
    not stable enough to be usable

Similar Threads

  1. Layer7-12 resolution
    By GabeReality in forum Catalyst Software
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 29-05-2011, 10:17 AM
  2. Is there a max resolution for QT files?
    By ping141 in forum Catalyst Software
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-02-2007, 06:13 AM
  3. Hog 3 position resolution
    By samsc in forum Bug reports
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-03-2006, 01:48 PM
  4. Resolution Reset
    By MacStgTek in forum Bug reports
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 15-08-2005, 07:21 PM
  5. Catalyst to DL-1 Resolution
    By texas62 in forum Catalyst Technology questions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-03-2005, 02:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •