Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Final CUT Pro X - abomination

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    fine to disagree- i have been doing this a long time too- i used to edit with real film - back in the day - on steenbecks or similar - you don't even have twin AB rolls on these devices- I'm a film guy - not a video guy - i started on film- not umatic-

    but i just hit a brick wall trying to use it to edit after around 15 minutes of trying-
    so maybe it just doesn't suit my way of editing at all-




    editing is an indeterminate thing - its an indeterminate process - you don't know the answer to an edit- whats going to work or not work-

    editing is like feeling in the dark for the creative solution to creating a meaning - through an intuition - through an emotion - through a connection-
    actually the technology is irrelevant - unless it gets in the way

    its the way you feel the cut - or the way the cut works - it doesn't have to be precise-

    but you lay it out in a certain way - opening it up- you don't work in one direction

    creating little sequences- on separate reels - asking questions like - how will these pieces join together-

    ---

    but as a tool - they removed many pieces that people still use- and so do my clients.
    projects don't develop from 'tasters' thats bullshit - this isn't a way to treat your clients in any industry- you don't throw your 10 year old product in the bin - unless you have an agenda.

    I'm a developer- there is an agenda here - that isn't obvious

    Quote Originally Posted by jjrecort View Post
    Richard, let me disagree... as editor, working with computers and video since the mid 80's I have to say that FCP X it's the 1st real step ahead since the timeline was invented.

    I have worked with many systems... now afters a few months of using FCPX, the rest of apps seems to me as old as going back to U-Matic editors. It's ultra fast, I do the same as before in half the time... it's a sample of the future of the editing... obviously, there are lot's of lacks, but this is why is version 0... just a "taste" of what is coming.

  2. #2
    oh - the agenda-

    well apple considers 'quicktime' as legacy - obsolete -

    and so is removing it from all its products - and doesn't want any dependancy on it moving forwards- the 64 bit 32 bit performance hype is nonsense-

    hence the removal of massive amounts of functionality for final cut X- all the 'legacy' stuff - the stuff that does things that people actually use...
    like proper video capture- like proper video output- all these use 'legacy' obsoleted API - for which there is no equivalent replacement.
    The reason they couldn't update final cut was - they killed the api's it relied on... but didn't replace them with anything anywhere near as complete


    and replacing it with something that works on its iPhones and iPads.... making people use h264 -

    well that causes a little problem for people who actually use quicktime to get things done.

Similar Threads

  1. Final Cut Pro HD is out and free to upgrade
    By litemover in forum Catalyst Technology questions
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 26-03-2007, 01:07 PM
  2. Multicam editing in final cut pro
    By samsc in forum Catalyst Technology questions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-11-2004, 11:05 PM
  3. Chroma keying in final cut
    By samsc in forum Catalyst Technology questions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14-06-2004, 05:01 PM
  4. Final Cut updated to Final Cut Pro HD
    By samsc in forum Catalyst Technology questions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 18-04-2004, 09:03 PM
  5. alpha channel text in final cut 4
    By samsc in forum Catalyst Technology questions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22-09-2003, 02:32 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •