Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: More Codec performance test

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    More Codec performance test

    60 different codecs and compression settings on 3 different single drive systems.
    Playback is on 1 layer only. Results do not scale to multiple layers
    NOTE: System disc is NOT the drive disc.

    Tested
    Single Raptor 74GB
    Single 10k SCSI Atlas iV
    Single 15k SCSI

    Results:
    Different drive Systems are pretty similiar.
    10k drive is not slower than 15k drive.
    Raptor is slower at uncompressed data - but pretty similiar with compressed codecs. ( Blackmagic codecs are uncompressed )
    Single layer 25fps playback of 720p footage is possible with:
    photojpeg 50% & 75% and mjpegA 50% & 75%

    Single layer 25 fps playback of 1080p footage is possible with
    photojpeg 50% and mjpeg 50% ( just )
    and marginally at photojpeg 75% and mjpegA 75% ( just )
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2

    4 layer playback tests now includes dual raptor

    60 different codecs tested playing back 4 layers of the same type of content

    tested on internal drive
    internal raptor 74GB
    scsi 15000rpm Maxtor Atlas 74GB
    scsi 10000rpm Maxtor Atlas iV 140GB
    dual raptor - firmtek card

    Results

    Internal drive is very very bad.( and these figures are just averages - not deviations, the internal drive has poor consistency ).
    Raptor, and scsi 10k and scsi 15k have close performance.
    scsi 10k is slightly faster with some codecs.

    Only dv-ntsc will give close to 30fps performance on all 4 layers.
    DV-NTSC is slightly faster than DV-PAL- the difference is important
    Attached Files Attached Files

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by samsc
    60 different codecs tested playing back 4 layers of the same type of content
    These results are a little geeky.
    Ill try and find to way to present them which makes more sense.

  4. #4

    Single and Dual raptor side by side

    Single and dual raptors same files.
    4th layer complete time

    dual raptors have slight edge with dv codecs.
    Not much in it.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  5. #5
    Softraid vs Apple raid.

    Very little in it....
    Attached Files Attached Files

  6. #6

    SoftRAID settings

    Quote Originally Posted by samsc
    Softraid vs Apple raid.

    Very little in it....
    Did you play with any of the settings? Different , journalled or not, etc.

  7. #7

    Thank you

    Richard,

    Thank you for this very valuable and obviously painstaking information. It must have taken a very long time to compile all of this.

    I'm just curious, what was the media you used for this? What clip was it?

    Christian Choi

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by litemover
    Richard,

    Thank you for this very valuable and obviously painstaking information. It must have taken a very long time to compile all of this.

    I'm just curious, what was the media you used for this? What clip was it?

    Christian Choi
    I automated everything, and had the software write out the results to a tab delimited file.
    ...Im lazy...
    then i imported all the information into excel. Wrote some scripts to order everything correctly, then plotted graphs in Deltagraph.
    Took about 5 days.
    But the results were worth it.
    I now have the ability to benchmark anything really quickly.
    And I built-in the testing to the software - so you can do it if i tell you where its hidden...

    ---

    I used 5 different hi-def 1080p files from Digital juice,
    http://www.digitaljuice.com/products...p?cid=1&pvid=5

    i converted them using 'Compressor' to 68 different file formats.
    Compressor is quite good at doing this- and will do 68 output files - into the correct folders - with different sizes and codecs - from a single click....
    http://www.apple.com/dvdstudiopro/compressor.html

    i got my copy from buying DVD studio pro.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by samsc
    I now have the ability to benchmark anything really quickly.
    And I built-in the testing to the software - so you can do it if i tell you where its hidden...
    Sounds good to me! Nevertheless, Great job at figuring all that out. Thank you again.

    Christian Choi

  10. #10
    Christian,

    The thumbnail thing on the EX-1/ DX2 was actually developed for Catalyst Media Servers ;-). You have to have the same content on the DX2 Mac as you do on the EX-1.

    I saw the EX-1 running with 3 3d objects and a artbeats movie behind. The performance was not good. The movie was playing at around 15 fps... I noticed this at their demo.

    I was under the impression that the EX-1 spare media server was just that. Or for doing dual output stuff.

    The problem with the EX-1 is you could spend all your programming time just lighting your 3D objects - which you could do in Maya or any other 3d package.

    Zillions of DMX channels.

    Hugh

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •