Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: More Codec performance test

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Single and Dual raptor side by side

    Single and dual raptors same files.
    4th layer complete time

    dual raptors have slight edge with dv codecs.
    Not much in it.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2
    Softraid vs Apple raid.

    Very little in it....
    Attached Files Attached Files

  3. #3

    SoftRAID settings

    Quote Originally Posted by samsc
    Softraid vs Apple raid.

    Very little in it....
    Did you play with any of the settings? Different , journalled or not, etc.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by mdc1138
    Did you play with any of the settings? Different , journalled or not, etc.
    I always turn off journalling.
    Always.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    163
    Just wondering why DV PAL only makes an appearance at 50%

    Cheers

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by tharding
    Just wondering why DV PAL only makes an appearance at 50%

    Cheers
    DV-PAL and DV-NTSC have no quality settings.
    Their compression rate is fixed, and unchangeable.
    50% is just a convention.
    Its not really 50%

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by mdc1138
    Did you play with any of the settings? Different , journalled or not, etc.
    Take a look at the EX1....

    Dual Dual pentiums, 8 drives?

    Ask them about performance?
    Danny can give you their contact numbers.

    http://www.vlps.com/NorthAmerica/news/vlps_30.phtml

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by samsc
    Take a look at the EX1....

    Dual Dual pentiums, 8 drives?

    Ask them about performance?
    Danny can give you their contact numbers.
    Does Danny work for them now or something? Looks interesting but only3 movie layers and 2 adjustment layers? The media window on the DX2 does rock though. Having the ability to automatically index your files into thumbnails onto a touchscreen with all the playmodes on it sure does beat building palettes.

    I'm very interested in quality of playback, particularly of Hidef. Not to be honest or anything, but I never use the 3d effects, even in Catalyst. I suppose I would if I needed to wrap them around a 3d opbject just to get them to read tangiably. So far, I haven't needed to use them. I barely have enough time to push video out let alone light layers and worry about rotating stuff around though, I suppose this could make for some very interesting effects that can't be done via video, if you explored the possibilities and had the time to really dive into it.

    Christian Choi

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by litemover
    Does Danny work for them now or something?Christian Choi
    Danny is still at highend. Danny knows the team at VLPS.

    I never use 3d either - i think it very cheesy unless it rendered with great skill.
    And the 3d artists- have phonemenal tools available to them these days.

    Dodgy 3d in real time just isnt going to cut it- when you are competing with stuff rendered in Maya or whatever.

    Peoples expectations of 3d these days- are way too high. They dont understand the countless hours and days of rendering required in the production process to make their stuff look good.
    Its the same for video too.
    Making video look professional is a shit load of work.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •