Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: video switcher control via catalyst

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick Murray View Post
    Hi,
    I agree with Todd, we have a couple of Analog way smartfade units which have a pc based interface for configuring inputs and for switching, we tryed in vain to get the switcher
    its almost always the cables people get wrong.

    its not mac vs pc. its not my software - its not even the serial data rates.

    there is no universal standard for pinouts on rs232 cables and connectors.

    its much older technology.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by samsc View Post
    its not mac vs pc.
    Theoretically, it's actually easier to use serial on a PC because most PCs have serial ports already built in. This is a legacy feature of many PC boards.

    Macs require USB to serial adaptors. When High End was shipping Catalyst, they included a few of these serial devices in each package. They worked okay but there are other choices out there as well.

    ...and yes, Catalyst runs serial very well.
    SourceChild
    TODD SCRUTCHFIELD

    ...if it ain't broke...
    gimme 5 and then don't act surprised

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by SourceChild View Post
    Theoretically, it's actually easier to use serial on a PC because most PCs have serial ports already built in. This is a legacy feature of many PC boards.

    Macs require USB to serial adaptors. When High End was shipping Catalyst, they included a few of these serial devices in each package. They worked okay but there are other choices out there as well.

    ...and yes, Catalyst runs serial very well.

    some of the hideous cable complexity is here:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rs232c#...TE_relative.29

    the connector and pinout problem does not go away magically with pc's

    its not the interfaces that go wrong - its the cables and pinouts.

    there is no standardised male/female connector relationship- rs232 talks about DTE and DCE equipment which doesnt work with modern computers.

    there are a whole bunch of hardware handshaking pins that may or may not need to be connected - or pulled up or pulled down - depending on the device itself.

    every single device i had to use in the past used a different pinout or pinout combination.
    you are lucky if your device just uses the receive and transmit pins -
    but the receive and transmit pins can be wired with 2 different conventions depending on the device.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by SourceChild View Post
    Theoretically, it's actually easier to use serial on a PC because most PCs have serial ports already built in. This is a legacy feature of many PC boards.
    ...its not the port that goes wrong...

Similar Threads

  1. pixel mapped Fixture Controller as regular fixture profile
    By Mick Murray in forum Catalyst Feature requests
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 18-06-2008, 10:54 PM
  2. video switcher
    By kiwi in forum Catalyst Technical support
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22-05-2008, 01:29 PM
  3. Cue control issue in Catalyst
    By SourceChild in forum Catalyst Technology questions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-04-2008, 09:39 AM
  4. Catalyst control Window
    By FreakQuency in forum Catalyst Software
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-01-2007, 01:16 PM
  5. The Catalyst Digital Switcher Wing
    By litemover in forum Catalyst Feature requests
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 19-04-2004, 10:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •