Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Lighting desk

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    UK - Milton Keynes
    Posts
    807
    well - catalyst is a video software tool that by defenition uses hardware to operate! .... and I think we were discusing lighting desks - not catalyst here though...

    Vista is at least 3 years old and has gone through huge continual development (including hardware for PC based systems!)

    Hog PC may have started out as a simulator - however, it now forms the core of the iPC

    I can't accept that you think a software only version of any lighting desk is a substitute for the real thing. In some cases, it may be a budget alternative for simple installs or learning - but never a real alternative on a live gig.

  2. #2
    do you remember the Status Cue ?

    What I wish it's a Strong Software and a flexible control surface .

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by emilianomorgia View Post
    do you remember the Status Cue ?

    What I wish it's a Strong Software and a flexible control surface .

    Oh GOD! I freaking hate that old desk. No multipart fades and no FX generator.
    SourceChild
    TODD SCRUTCHFIELD

    ...if it ain't broke...
    gimme 5 and then don't act surprised

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by SourceChild View Post
    Oh GOD! I freaking hate that old desk. No multipart fades and no FX generator.
    Sure ! 10 or more years ago !!!!

    but what was that ? an external CPU with a control surface .

  5. #5
    I can only second Hugh´s view on things:

    The Hog2 is still a great console for live media server control.

    Complex timing is easily programmed and I can change the library as I need it. For example I like to sepearte parameters to Focus and Beam (Xpos, Ypos, Rotation, Scale, Aspectratio are Focus (or Position) parameters for me).
    That makes masking the things I need much more easy.

    But the Hog2 are loosing their shape on the hardware side. I often find Grandmasters that will no longer output full 100% - and that is a pain in the a.. when your layers get transparent if you don´t want them to. There also is the "stuck choose button" issue that can drive you crazy...

    Hog3 is a good replacement for Hog2. The Programmer is more powerful - especially aplying timing is faster than on any other console.
    But there are still some bugs with updating a cuelist that is live on stage - so you need to be careful.

    The MA is a good console but it is not my way of programming a show. Complex timing gets you selecting single cells in spreadsheets and a lot of wheel turning and clicking...
    Olli
    ------
    Oliver Ranft, Aachen, Germany

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by OlliR View Post
    For example I like to sepearte parameters to Focus and Beam (Xpos, Ypos, Rotation, Scale, Aspectratio are Focus (or Position) parameters for me).
    Remember that on a Hog3, you can split a palette window. I have several shows where I have all four touch monitors up and have two beam palettes open, a group and color on one monitor and still have my editor open and since all 4 are touch screens, this screams through.

    Yes, I agree that HES should create media sever library files that put the position parameters on the position palette but also remember that the reason they put all media server parameters on beam is that beam is a "per function" split palette.

    Most uses want to keep position as a "per type" instead of a "per parameter" so that you don't accidentally get x only and miss y.

    Of course if there was a way at the root level of the Hog3 that would allow a user to split palette parameter grouping "per fixture type" then this would all be solved. (It was a request I send HES about 2 years ago)
    SourceChild
    TODD SCRUTCHFIELD

    ...if it ain't broke...
    gimme 5 and then don't act surprised

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr_P View Post
    Vista is at least 3 years old and has gone through huge continual development (including hardware for PC based systems!)
    Vista is a pain in the ass. I can't begin to tell you how slow it is in comparison to a H3, Maxxyz, Vector, or MA. It's all about shortcuts, key combination, and command lines that speed up programming for me.

    Even though I love the idea of timeline programming, vista is still slower for me to program complex cues and timeline elements very fast. But I just know tricks most users still haven't learned yet

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr_P View Post
    I can't accept that you think a software only version of any lighting desk is a substitute for the real thing. In some cases, it may be a budget alternative for simple installs or learning - but never a real alternative on a live gig.
    On the contrary. I don't like software only control but there are some things that Sunlite and Light Jockey can do quickly that don't require hardware.

    Check out Nicolaudie and look at Sunlite. It is a relatively fast software based programmer and you can write your own custom libraries. And for under $1,000 USD, it's pretty damned capable.
    SourceChild
    TODD SCRUTCHFIELD

    ...if it ain't broke...
    gimme 5 and then don't act surprised

Similar Threads

  1. Digital Lighting University - Delft 8th October 2007
    By samsc in forum Catalyst Announcements
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-09-2007, 09:03 PM
  2. Preset Focus and Soft Edge?
    By gazzer82 in forum Catalyst Feature requests
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 28-05-2007, 08:37 PM
  3. Color Mixing inverts along with image inversion
    By Christian Choi in forum Bug reports
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 26-03-2007, 01:21 PM
  4. default files
    By RonaldBeal in forum Catalyst Software
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 16-06-2005, 01:23 AM
  5. Lighting optimised -NO. Use screen presets.
    By samsc in forum Catalyst Software
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-02-2005, 04:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •