Anyone tried this
http://www.mars-tech.com/aec-6890m.htm
It doesn't look like its pci-x though
Printable View
Anyone tried this
http://www.mars-tech.com/aec-6890m.htm
It doesn't look like its pci-x though
Jason.
I split your thread...
This is an internal only sata adaptor - one which has external ports might be more useful.
Not many specs shown here.
Its not worth getting something like this - unless it has external ports, as turning both internal drives into a raid set isnt a good idea.
Fundamentally you have to keep your content separate from the Operating system - physically separate - a separate disc:
Christian choi did a lot of playing around with sata raids.
Yes, but you can now get internal to external adapters from MacGurusQuote:
Originally Posted by samsc
http://www.macgurus.com/productpages/sata/satakits.php
(scroll to bottom of the page)
In fact, I missed this card
http://www.macgurus.com/productpages/RAID/SyncRAID.php
says there should be a 64bit card in spring of 05.....
im not a fan of sata drives in these kindof cases.
sata connectors are horrible.
but if someone can make it work then its worth a try.
But bear in mind that the headline data rate does nothing - nothing at all.
Its the drive latency and seek times that are important with multiple layers.
drive latency and seek time do not reduce with multiple drives in this configuration - if you are really lucky they will increase.
But do not ever try and use one of those horrible internal drive adaptors like the G5 jam - they really dont work - and arent 'movable' -let alone tourable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by samsc
Since this is a Hardware RAID card, how is this different that the RAID controller used in an XSERVE RAID for instance? I undersatnd the drive latency is what is important, but once again, what is the difference compared to what is used in an xserve RAID? I thought they were just average, run of the mill drives in there.
no specs given on ACARD hardware raid
I dont have any idea how well any raid system will work until its tested.
---
Xserve RAID has a 512MB cache/channel.
Each Xserve RAID has dual channels. And uses Fibre Channel as its interface.
It is a totally different beast from the ACARD pci card here.
But I only know it works because I tested one. Nothing in the specs indicates 'a priori' that this will work with well Catalyst.
http://www.apple.com/xserve/raid/
Setting this up and making it work was MUCH easier than i expected.
Jason.
Are you going to buy one of these and give it a try?
Richard
Am Seriously considering it.Quote:
Originally Posted by samsc
If you get one, ill send you a document showing how to do automated performance self testing in the software.
then we can add this to the performance graphs i made early last year.
8 port sata card:
http://www.sonnettech.com/product/tempo-x_esata8.html
----
I just dont get the use of sata for this- it is not designed to do this kindof thing.
sata connectors are really really horrible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by samsc
But the costs for the size you get is really nice. I know it might not be the best for performance, but file sizes are getting larger and larger it seems.....
It would be nice to be able to have a large array and work with less compressed footage for high-def applications, which might be possible with these types of arrays from what I see.
In my application, I'm not touring, just doing specials, so the gear doesn't need to travel except when I take it to the gig.
Hugh and myself think you might be able to drive up to 6 complete catalyst media servers from an Xserve Raid.
You connect everything together with a fibre channel switch - and you dont need to use XSAN.
And you can reconfigure the thing with different numbers of disc/raid set to do higher definition as the need arises.
Testing not completed or verified yet.