When using the "Sync to ID#" The playback on the "synced" catalysts seems a bit "jerky" am I doing anything wrong.
Since we are using 8 catalyst to do a backwall I would really like to use it!
Bullen
Printable View
When using the "Sync to ID#" The playback on the "synced" catalysts seems a bit "jerky" am I doing anything wrong.
Since we are using 8 catalyst to do a backwall I would really like to use it!
Bullen
you dont need it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullen
dont use it.
just start the movies playing back at the same time.
did you try using the public beta?Quote:
Originally Posted by samsc
it works differently from the release.
did you use the public beta?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullen
which disc drives are you using?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullen
Will do!Quote:
Originally Posted by samsc
Bullen
Lacie Big Disk 250 GB Soft Raided (Stripe) via two separate FW800 Cards (the internal one and one x-tra)Quote:
Originally Posted by samsc
Bullen
fw 800 isnt good.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullen
no ide drives are great.
needs to be scsi or raptors.
The seem to work fine here!Quote:
Originally Posted by samsc
Aren't Raptors very fragile?? I meen touring around with??
Bullen
Hello Bullen,
in our catalyst media servers we use two WD Raptor 74GB HD´s in RAID 0 but I didn´t find any time testing it before. May be this helps you and you can make some quick tests with only using these HD´s?
But as you know, I had also problems by using play with ID. Do you try using other ID´s than 1 for "master"? Sorry but I can´t recognize how I´ve solved the problem! Can also be that the problem was still there but I havn´t seen it in the short testing time. I´m sad that I´m not able to test it now again cause of missing G5´s ;-)
it doesnt work as well if you put the os on the same disc as the media.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
there is a penalty in placing the os on the raid.
you need to keep the media drives separate from the operating system.
richard
no more fragile than any hard disc?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullen
The performance is a whole lot better.
Like it works....it really makes a difference.
Standard ATA drives - in any configuration you care to mention - raid this or that - particularily using firewire dont work as well.
Raptors are almost as fast as scsi.
Chris.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Who advised you to use Raptors?
R
Testing with the Beta, that works fine, I don't think it was a HD problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Bullen
you arent playing back enough layers at the moment to notice the hard drive issues.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullen
The beta uses a slightly different sync algorithm.
We got our media servers from the Highend distributor in Germany and they I think got their information from Highend in London and there Hugh must be the responsable person!? It was the newest configuration suggestion at the time we bought them.Quote:
Originally Posted by samsc
I hope that this information was right!?
Raptors are the way to go.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
I personally prefer the single disc internal scsi solution because the disc capacity is bigger.
Not sure about whether to put them in a raid array with the system disc on the same disc just yet.
Mike in austin is still doing some testing.
Performance is definitely better if you dont put the system on the media disc.
But this only affects 4 simultaneous layers at 25fps....
This is a complex debate.