Do you want to share your killer casedesign? we are replacing ours.Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerr
Printable View
Do you want to share your killer casedesign? we are replacing ours.Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerr
if you are going to use a decklink extreme, you need a lot of space at the back, you probably need at least 10cm.Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin
it has a big cable with all the video connectors.
its doesnt bend too easily.
definetly would not work in highend's cases. they have no room at the back.
see attachment. this is a monster cable!
with the standard decklink cards - its just bnc's mounted on the pci card
Hi,
I´ve installed an G5 with 2xraptors (73Gb) with Apples own RAID tool,
their in RAID0, It works very very well..
mail me if you have any questions:
jan at opsethgruppen dot no
regards,
jan opseth
Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerr
works even better if you put the system on a different disc.Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
( it does make a difference with accuracy of playback over long segments on 4 layers - I know martin had a few issues with this in norway )
it more important in ntsc 30hz systems which have to work faster.
we only have to work at 25hz in europe - but an issue with dl1's makes them work better at 30hz too.
--
The system can interupt playback when it does house keeping or any other work - that involves disc access, or virtual memory.
We tested this and found out that we did not get any more performance on a raid than on 1 std disk and 1 sata. os on one and cat on the other.Quote:
Originally Posted by samsc
besides, when one disk fucks up, you can keep a backup on the other, so you can (hopefully) still do the show. :cool: As for the playback sync problem, the use layer function saved the day. :)
keeping the os separate gives slightly better performance over the long term - minutes -Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin
i dont think using an internal raid is good either. if one disc goes down - you loose everything.
there is no difference between using 1 or 2 raptors - unless you need the extra gb capacity - or unless you want to play back uncompressed movies.
jan. if you dont want to register thats fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
no email addresses on this site are visible to any search engines - or any users.
they are all hidden.
even the 'send email' function available from the members lists - is driven from a form - it does not give out or display my email address.
http://chaldee1.gotadsl.co.uk/~richa...mailmember&u=1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin
It´s very strange you did´t see any better perf. with Raid0.. I tested this.. with and without... i did see better results with RAID
you should´t be worried the disk´s should crash.. does the OS disk fail your f...ed anyway.. If you shall be totaly backed up You should do Raid 3 or 5 external.. Better yet is SCSI 15k Cheetah´s, I have 2pc of this ones in my Windows computer in Raid 0 and I´m seeing a lot of a difference..
(vs. s-ata), so it´s a difference with RAID.
Disks rearly f... (as long as you don´t have IBM´s) What if your disk in your GrandMA or WH3 fails? THEN you are f..
Jan O..
Which Application?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan Opseth
What kindof tests did you do?
We tested it with the Apple people, and as you can see from the Catalyst benchmark tests, it´s not a special difference. We also tested raptors V Scsi raid at the workshop yesterday, and only on uncompressed and on 4 layers is there a noticable difference. On standard DVpal, the difference is not visible.