View Full Version : Catalyst Perfomance
foxrider
03-08-2010, 09:31 AM
Hi, I'm wondering if anyone cares to share the maximum number of HD their Catalyst machine can run. Please share your Mac Pro Specs as well.
Here's mine:
2009 single 2.9GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon "Nehalem" processor
8Gb ram
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB
256GB SSD OCZ
Max Layers of HD1080p: 2 Layers
Is this what I should expect out of my Quad Core machine or is there something that I didn't do right to get more layers?
Spam Butterfly
03-08-2010, 03:55 PM
What codec and frame rate are you using?
Hugh
With some AIC 'stock content' at 1920x1080 25fps and an OCZ Vertex SSD, I have been able to run 3-4 layers on pretty much any Mac Pro with updated graphics card from 2007-2010
However, It all depends upon the content codec and frame rate....
Simon
foxrider
04-08-2010, 03:00 AM
Hi Simon,
do you mean you are able to run 3-4 layers of AIC 1080p content on either quad core or 8 core machine?
Yes - but it depends upon the content, codec and frame rate, SSD, Graphics card, OS, hardware revision
(...if the sun is shining... whether the day of the week has a W in it...)
Seriously: - there can be a lot of factors that affect performance - this is why no-one commits to actual results.
You have to test with the system you have available and as close to the real content as possible.
I;ve achieved these results on my stock of MacPros (ranging from 2007-2010) with my HD stock content... it will probably differ slightly on yours
S
foxrider
04-08-2010, 12:22 PM
Now, all makes sense to me now. Thanks Simon.
We have some quad cores - with ATI 1900 ( Tiger ) and some eight cores with 8800 ( leopard ) Strangly, but the Tiger can run 4 layers of 1080p AIC and the Eight cores, 3 layers... sometimes 4.
Just as an example,... we had a event wich the movies are BLACK and WHITE, and we achived 5 layers of 1080p... so all depends on the content.
samsc
04-08-2010, 06:36 PM
Hi Simon,
do you mean you are able to run 3-4 layers of AIC 1080p content on either quad core or 8 core machine?
with 2009 macs you should be able to get 6-8 layers of 1080p with AIC codec
i get 6-8 layers on my 2009 8 core 2.26Ghz mac with AIC 1080p 25fps
2009 macs with 10.6.x are significantly faster than 2008 with 10.5.x
around 20-40% faster
with 10.6.x more cores have improved performance - more cores are better.
samsc
04-08-2010, 06:38 PM
We have some quad cores - with ATI 1900 ( Tiger ) and some eight cores with 8800 ( leopard ) Strangly, but the Tiger can run 4 layers of 1080p AIC and the Eight cores, 3 layers... sometimes 4.
Just as an example,... we had a event wich the movies are BLACK and WHITE, and we achived 5 layers of 1080p... so all depends on the content.
10.6.x and 2009 macs are significantly faster than the ones before
the processors are hyperthreaded - meaning the cores are split in 2- and 8 cores appears as 16 processes-
and 10.6.x uses all the cores to playback movies - it splits playback properly across all available processors
even on low end 2009 machine i get 6-8 layers
samsc
04-08-2010, 06:42 PM
Hi Simon,
do you mean you are able to run 3-4 layers of AIC 1080p content on either quad core or 8 core machine?
for most layers you need to use apple intermediate codec-
for best quality people use apple pro res ( which comes in 5 flavours )
depends on what people want-
there is significant performance difference between codecs - and data rates
samsc
04-08-2010, 06:52 PM
We have some quad cores - with ATI 1900 ( Tiger ) and some eight cores with 8800 ( leopard ) Strangly, but the Tiger can run 4 layers of 1080p AIC and the Eight cores, 3 layers... sometimes 4.
Just as an example,... we had a event wich the movies are BLACK and WHITE, and we achived 5 layers of 1080p... so all depends on the content.
the jpeg algorithms used in most codecs are sensitive to data rate of the movie-
the more information in a frame - the higher the data rate - the longer it takes to decode.
black and white movies usually have lower data rates - so can be decompressed faster
each frame in a movie ( in most movie files ) has different amounts of information - and decompress time varies throughout movie playback-
so its not dependant on the weather - its dependant on the movie data rates - and this varies on the type of images.
and everyones images are different.
with 2009 macs you should be able to get 6-8 layers of 1080p with AIC codec
i get 6-8 layers on my 2009 8 core 2.26Ghz mac with AIC 1080p 25fps
I've never got more than 4 layers of AIC at 1080p 25fps on ANY MacPro... not even the same spec as you quoted.
How do you manage to get 6-8 layers on 2009/2010 MacPros?
S
samsc
04-08-2010, 07:46 PM
I've never got more than 4 layers of AIC at 1080p 25fps on ANY MacPro... not even the same spec as you quoted.
How do you manage to get 6-8 layers on 2009/2010 MacPros?
S
suggest you run test G on your systems and send charts.
and we can check the spec of the machines you have-
samsc
04-08-2010, 08:14 PM
there isnt much mystery to performance - every machine is different
using test G on a folder full of the same file type - image and codec - with different movies
i didnt optimise or use latest hardware - i like to test on older systems - so this is not optimised to get best performance.
2009 mac pro 2.26GHz 8 core 10.6.4 GT120 - ssd
tests with gt120 ( which isnt great and is not recommended ) - on old mtron ssd - 1920x1080 output
first file is range of codecs from photojpeg to prores
second file shows 1080p AIC 6-7 layers - 30 different aic files
third file 20 layers 720x576 AIC
---
performance tests are not in show context and every machine needs to be tested by end users
this is only a general indicator not a specification
foxrider
09-08-2010, 07:34 PM
there isnt much mystery to performance - every machine is different
using test G on a folder full of the same file type - image and codec - with different movies
i didnt optimise or use latest hardware - i like to test on older systems - so this is not optimised to get best performance.
2009 mac pro 2.26GHz 8 core 10.6.4 GT120 - ssd
tests with gt120 ( which isnt great and is not recommended ) - on old mtron ssd - 1920x1080 output
first file is range of codecs from photojpeg to prores
second file shows 1080p AIC 6-7 layers - 30 different aic files
third file 20 layers 720x576 AIC
---
performance tests are not in show context and every machine needs to be tested by end users
this is only a general indicator not a specification
Hi Richard, is it possible that you provide some test files in different resolutions so that I can test my machine with the similar files that you use and compare.
Can you comment on quad cores machines and 8 cores machine. Will the 8 cores machines be able to run more layers than the quad cores since you mention that 10.6.x uses all cores.
samsc
09-08-2010, 08:50 PM
Hi Richard, is it possible that you provide some test files in different resolutions so that I can test my machine with the similar files that you use and compare.
Can you comment on quad cores machines and 8 cores machine. Will the 8 cores machines be able to run more layers than the quad cores since you mention that 10.6.x uses all cores.
the point is that all content is different - so you have to use your own files.
or what you have access to.
cores arent important unless you have a lot of layers.
the order of importance is
1. codec for file -
2. ssd
3. cpu and graphics card
SourceChild
15-08-2010, 10:50 AM
In a 2009:
8 core 2.26
8GB RAM
OCZ 250GB
1920x1080 x 2
Using AIC AND general After Effects content I have seen:
4 layers on out 1 and 4 layers on out 2 at 25FPS (8 total layers) no FX
3 layers on out 1 and 3 layers on out 2 at 30FPS (6 total layers) no FX
I have tried the same thing however, with the same size content but content that is much more vibrantly colored and complex (like HD footage of nature) that caused frame drop.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.