PDA

View Full Version : Catalyst Perfomance



foxrider
03-08-2010, 10:31 AM
Hi, I'm wondering if anyone cares to share the maximum number of HD their Catalyst machine can run. Please share your Mac Pro Specs as well.

Here's mine:
2009 single 2.9GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon "Nehalem" processor
8Gb ram
ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB
256GB SSD OCZ
Max Layers of HD1080p: 2 Layers

Is this what I should expect out of my Quad Core machine or is there something that I didn't do right to get more layers?

Spam Butterfly
03-08-2010, 04:55 PM
What codec and frame rate are you using?

Hugh

Mr_P
03-08-2010, 08:26 PM
With some AIC 'stock content' at 1920x1080 25fps and an OCZ Vertex SSD, I have been able to run 3-4 layers on pretty much any Mac Pro with updated graphics card from 2007-2010

However, It all depends upon the content codec and frame rate....

Simon

foxrider
04-08-2010, 04:00 AM
Hi Simon,

do you mean you are able to run 3-4 layers of AIC 1080p content on either quad core or 8 core machine?

Mr_P
04-08-2010, 11:28 AM
Yes - but it depends upon the content, codec and frame rate, SSD, Graphics card, OS, hardware revision

(...if the sun is shining... whether the day of the week has a W in it...)
Seriously: - there can be a lot of factors that affect performance - this is why no-one commits to actual results.

You have to test with the system you have available and as close to the real content as possible.

I;ve achieved these results on my stock of MacPros (ranging from 2007-2010) with my HD stock content... it will probably differ slightly on yours

S

foxrider
04-08-2010, 01:22 PM
Now, all makes sense to me now. Thanks Simon.

Gian
04-08-2010, 07:33 PM
We have some quad cores - with ATI 1900 ( Tiger ) and some eight cores with 8800 ( leopard ) Strangly, but the Tiger can run 4 layers of 1080p AIC and the Eight cores, 3 layers... sometimes 4.
Just as an example,... we had a event wich the movies are BLACK and WHITE, and we achived 5 layers of 1080p... so all depends on the content.

samsc
04-08-2010, 07:36 PM
Hi Simon,

do you mean you are able to run 3-4 layers of AIC 1080p content on either quad core or 8 core machine?

with 2009 macs you should be able to get 6-8 layers of 1080p with AIC codec

i get 6-8 layers on my 2009 8 core 2.26Ghz mac with AIC 1080p 25fps

2009 macs with 10.6.x are significantly faster than 2008 with 10.5.x

around 20-40% faster

with 10.6.x more cores have improved performance - more cores are better.

samsc
04-08-2010, 07:38 PM
We have some quad cores - with ATI 1900 ( Tiger ) and some eight cores with 8800 ( leopard ) Strangly, but the Tiger can run 4 layers of 1080p AIC and the Eight cores, 3 layers... sometimes 4.
Just as an example,... we had a event wich the movies are BLACK and WHITE, and we achived 5 layers of 1080p... so all depends on the content.

10.6.x and 2009 macs are significantly faster than the ones before

the processors are hyperthreaded - meaning the cores are split in 2- and 8 cores appears as 16 processes-

and 10.6.x uses all the cores to playback movies - it splits playback properly across all available processors

even on low end 2009 machine i get 6-8 layers

samsc
04-08-2010, 07:42 PM
Hi Simon,

do you mean you are able to run 3-4 layers of AIC 1080p content on either quad core or 8 core machine?

for most layers you need to use apple intermediate codec-

for best quality people use apple pro res ( which comes in 5 flavours )

depends on what people want-

there is significant performance difference between codecs - and data rates

samsc
04-08-2010, 07:52 PM
We have some quad cores - with ATI 1900 ( Tiger ) and some eight cores with 8800 ( leopard ) Strangly, but the Tiger can run 4 layers of 1080p AIC and the Eight cores, 3 layers... sometimes 4.
Just as an example,... we had a event wich the movies are BLACK and WHITE, and we achived 5 layers of 1080p... so all depends on the content.

the jpeg algorithms used in most codecs are sensitive to data rate of the movie-

the more information in a frame - the higher the data rate - the longer it takes to decode.

black and white movies usually have lower data rates - so can be decompressed faster

each frame in a movie ( in most movie files ) has different amounts of information - and decompress time varies throughout movie playback-

so its not dependant on the weather - its dependant on the movie data rates - and this varies on the type of images.
and everyones images are different.

Mr_P
04-08-2010, 08:36 PM
with 2009 macs you should be able to get 6-8 layers of 1080p with AIC codec

i get 6-8 layers on my 2009 8 core 2.26Ghz mac with AIC 1080p 25fps

I've never got more than 4 layers of AIC at 1080p 25fps on ANY MacPro... not even the same spec as you quoted.
How do you manage to get 6-8 layers on 2009/2010 MacPros?

S

samsc
04-08-2010, 08:46 PM
I've never got more than 4 layers of AIC at 1080p 25fps on ANY MacPro... not even the same spec as you quoted.
How do you manage to get 6-8 layers on 2009/2010 MacPros?

S

suggest you run test G on your systems and send charts.

and we can check the spec of the machines you have-

samsc
04-08-2010, 09:14 PM
there isnt much mystery to performance - every machine is different

using test G on a folder full of the same file type - image and codec - with different movies

i didnt optimise or use latest hardware - i like to test on older systems - so this is not optimised to get best performance.
2009 mac pro 2.26GHz 8 core 10.6.4 GT120 - ssd
tests with gt120 ( which isnt great and is not recommended ) - on old mtron ssd - 1920x1080 output

first file is range of codecs from photojpeg to prores
second file shows 1080p AIC 6-7 layers - 30 different aic files
third file 20 layers 720x576 AIC

---

performance tests are not in show context and every machine needs to be tested by end users

this is only a general indicator not a specification

foxrider
09-08-2010, 08:34 PM
there isnt much mystery to performance - every machine is different

using test G on a folder full of the same file type - image and codec - with different movies

i didnt optimise or use latest hardware - i like to test on older systems - so this is not optimised to get best performance.
2009 mac pro 2.26GHz 8 core 10.6.4 GT120 - ssd
tests with gt120 ( which isnt great and is not recommended ) - on old mtron ssd - 1920x1080 output

first file is range of codecs from photojpeg to prores
second file shows 1080p AIC 6-7 layers - 30 different aic files
third file 20 layers 720x576 AIC

---

performance tests are not in show context and every machine needs to be tested by end users

this is only a general indicator not a specification

Hi Richard, is it possible that you provide some test files in different resolutions so that I can test my machine with the similar files that you use and compare.

Can you comment on quad cores machines and 8 cores machine. Will the 8 cores machines be able to run more layers than the quad cores since you mention that 10.6.x uses all cores.

samsc
09-08-2010, 09:50 PM
Hi Richard, is it possible that you provide some test files in different resolutions so that I can test my machine with the similar files that you use and compare.

Can you comment on quad cores machines and 8 cores machine. Will the 8 cores machines be able to run more layers than the quad cores since you mention that 10.6.x uses all cores.

the point is that all content is different - so you have to use your own files.
or what you have access to.
cores arent important unless you have a lot of layers.

the order of importance is

1. codec for file -
2. ssd
3. cpu and graphics card

SourceChild
15-08-2010, 11:50 AM
In a 2009:
8 core 2.26
8GB RAM
OCZ 250GB
1920x1080 x 2

Using AIC AND general After Effects content I have seen:
4 layers on out 1 and 4 layers on out 2 at 25FPS (8 total layers) no FX
3 layers on out 1 and 3 layers on out 2 at 30FPS (6 total layers) no FX

I have tried the same thing however, with the same size content but content that is much more vibrantly colored and complex (like HD footage of nature) that caused frame drop.