Peter
30-12-2009, 10:30 AM
Hi all,
I would like your advice on the following. I've already done some test setups but i still dont get it.
Setup 1 :
Needed : projection of 1 movie which covers the whole area A to F but taking into account the seperate projection surfaces A-F, meaning that part of the movie which covers A will seamlessly run into to B, ... but will not be projected on the black (projecting 6 seperate movies on the 6 seperate surfaces is no problem).
At the moment i've tried the following but it didnt work :
1. making 6 layers (the same scale and XY=0, layer 2-6 use layer 1) sending to submixes 1 - 6
2. 6 submixes with sizes 1024x768 which covers the total area A-F (or should these be smaller?)
3. offsetts for A,B,C and D,E,F
4. mixes scaled the same and keystoned according to the different sizes of A-F (or should i do the keystoning and or XY in the layers?) - if i take 6 of the same size it works
But then the relation between them isnt fine any more. Meaning that the object in E will be more squashed then in D or F. Which does seem logical.
Setup 2 : a variation on 1 :
Needed : the same as setup 1 but i always loose a part of the image because the total area (green line) is bigger the what covers the surfaces A-H.
Best wishes to all!
Thanks,
Peter
I would like your advice on the following. I've already done some test setups but i still dont get it.
Setup 1 :
Needed : projection of 1 movie which covers the whole area A to F but taking into account the seperate projection surfaces A-F, meaning that part of the movie which covers A will seamlessly run into to B, ... but will not be projected on the black (projecting 6 seperate movies on the 6 seperate surfaces is no problem).
At the moment i've tried the following but it didnt work :
1. making 6 layers (the same scale and XY=0, layer 2-6 use layer 1) sending to submixes 1 - 6
2. 6 submixes with sizes 1024x768 which covers the total area A-F (or should these be smaller?)
3. offsetts for A,B,C and D,E,F
4. mixes scaled the same and keystoned according to the different sizes of A-F (or should i do the keystoning and or XY in the layers?) - if i take 6 of the same size it works
But then the relation between them isnt fine any more. Meaning that the object in E will be more squashed then in D or F. Which does seem logical.
Setup 2 : a variation on 1 :
Needed : the same as setup 1 but i always loose a part of the image because the total area (green line) is bigger the what covers the surfaces A-H.
Best wishes to all!
Thanks,
Peter